Moderators: Dave Moll, Andrew Davie, Steve Anderson
Steve Anderson wrote:Harry, sit down and take a deep breath...tell you what...have a beer...on me...
I will admit as much as I visit this forum at least once a day I haven't been keeping up with this thread in detail.
It would seem you're fighting a war on several fronts, those that have had to do it, well, hats off. But here there is no reason to do so in this case.
Break the project down into sub-sections and deal with one at a time...don't get distracted by the other (future / in the pipeline) chunks.
My thinking...get the electronics sorted first, for me the easier part. Get it stable and DO NOT rely on that old dubious published stuff which specifies anything like a BC109C...it's 40 years out of date and can be accomplished so much easier these days.
Analyze, examine, inspect, survey, study, scrutinize and boil-down the results of each progressive step.
[/quote]DO NOT be disheartened. Those at Bletchly Park were not.
Steve A.
Steve Anderson wrote:Softly, softly, catchee monkey...
Steve A.
gary wrote:Harry if I am following you correctly, wouldn't you be better off sending a frequency sweep through it rather than a video signal? Then do a spectral analysis on the sweep.
gary wrote:Harry, if you need a sweep wave file and a frequency analysis just let me know - for me it is trivial, and is small repayment for your great images and videos.
gary wrote:>To make sure i haven't done any thing wrong i will have a think about it and i will redo the test it tomorrow .
Harry that approach is the basis of every single tiny little bit of progress mankind has ever made..
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests