Moderators: Dave Moll, Andrew Davie, Steve Anderson
Viewmaster wrote:Well that answer was a bloody waste of my time.
Viewmaster wrote:If you have access to a small lathe and a spare mandrel (buy on ebay), one can shave them yourself
with a razor suitably held in the lathe tool post !
Good quality sound is achieved by increasing recording speed and using a well damped recording stylus
mounted on parallelogram suspension driven by a loudspeaker .
Harry Dalek wrote:Viewmaster wrote:If you have access to a small lathe and a spare mandrel (buy on ebay), one can shave them yourself
with a razor suitably held in the lathe tool post !
Good quality sound is achieved by increasing recording speed and using a well damped recording stylus
mounted on parallelogram suspension driven by a loudspeaker .
Hi Albert
Something i was wondering for a while since this is being discussed ,was your experiment a vertical or horizontal recording as in the recording method in the video you said parallelogram suspension ?
Viewmaster wrote:I used Lateral cut. Anyway a parallelogram mounting can be used for either way to control the stylus.
Just reverse it's mounting by 90 degrees for hill and dale.
I made mine with two thin pieces of phos bronze shim.
BTW, I was concerned at the time that the sync pulses would not be very reliable when replayed
from the wax cylinder so designed the system to generate then off cylinder recording separately.
Lawnboy wrote:I was actually considering trying this same experiment. I bought an Ediphone dictation machine last summer with the intention of recording an unsynchronized NBTV signal and see what can be recovered. I got it working and managed to record a few seconds of sound, but the quality really is poor. The unit came with quite a few cylinders, unfortunately all but one are completely covered in mold and unusable for recording. If I had access to a shaver the cylinders could be refinished and made like new again, but those machines are rare so that seems unlikely.
Viewmaster wrote:I used Lateral cut. .
The picture is the telephone attachment i was speaking of in the first post.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests