Panrock wrote:Hi Graham,
Thank you for your comments, supportive as always. Much appreciated though not really earned. And thanks for the tips.
Well, there's now the page at http://www.radiocraft.co.uk/opto.htm of course, though it's a bit chaotic. Also Andrew Emmerson was on the phone last night. He's going to mention it in his regular column in 'Practical Electronics'.
Other than that I'm basically a shy soul and not into 'publicity' as such. I prefer the actual inventing process.
Cheers,
Steve O
Harry Dalek wrote:Yes Steve the dreaded reboot has struck me many a time as well .
Your new way does sound good you could make the transmitting light levels as large as you wanted with the smaller stages .
Harry Dalek wrote:I suppose you could switch stages on and off and if one failed you still have the others working .
Harry Dalek wrote:What distance is you goal line of sight ? reminds me of some others on light transmitting but they never tried wide bandwidth video like this .
Panrock wrote:Sod this for a lark! More in the usual place... and it's not particularly good.
I am now looking forward to switching efforts to the Mirror Screw for a while, since a visit from Karen Orton with her new Timing Corrector might now be imminent.
Steve O
Harry Dalek wrote:Some times it is good to put it away for a while and have a think about if its worth it ,pretty much did what you wanted the distance problem sounds like more money than what you could make Steve..
Harry Dalek wrote:Whats Karen's Timing corrector ? you should start a topic on it .
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 33 guests