acl wrote:As I understand it only one of the PIC chips requires a crystal reference. As shown it is a passive device. What are the advantages of selecting an active one? Cheers Chris Lewis
The solo crystal used in the MkI was to ensure the 625 video output was within specification in terms of timing, although older CRT TVs/monitors could handle a small amount of error of 1-2% or more (though not the colour sub-carrier), many modern flat-panel versions can't.
In the days of analogue PAL the colour sub-carrier was specified as 4.43361875MHz +/-1Hz within the TV station and transmitted. Often TV stations locked their SPGs (Sync Pulse Generators) to GPS which made it even more accurate. Some articles were published which used the off-air PAL sub-carrier at home as a frequency standard before GPS receivers were affordable to the general public. All other vision signals, line/frame times were derived from the sub-carrier so they too were of the same accuracy. Not that we need that here, just a bit of background...
In the MkI I did notice a few
minor artifacts due to the two micros running at slightly different frequencies, the internal HFOSC of the write processor is specified as 16MHz +/-2% from 0 to +60 Celcius at >2.5V supply. So the idea is to use the same oscillator to externally feed both micros. I have seen the oscillator in one micro feeding another micro, but this strikes me as a 'fudge', hence the active oscillator feeding both. They're only a quid or two..it also frees up an I/O pin on each micro if needed.
Steve A.