Black Dwarf

Anything not specifically related to NBTV, but at least of some technical nature that might be of interest to NBTV members. Items for sale and links to retailers do not belong here.

Moderators: Dave Moll, Steve Anderson

Postby Dave Moll » Tue Apr 09, 2013 1:35 am

First, apologies for not getting back with my comments from the Astronomical Society sooner. To be perfectly honest, I completely forgot, but came across my printout of Steve's initial question while going through my file in preparation for this month's meeting.

I did read out the gist of what Steve asked, and received (ignoring the more flippant comments so typical of our members!) the following thoughts:

First, as already noted, the (present) universe is nowhere near old enough for any black dwarfs to have had time to form.

Second, "cinder" is probably a fairly accurate description, as the gravity would not really be high enough for the creation of diamonds - at least not at the surface. They may, however, have a massive (teracarat?) diamond at their core, but the surface gravity is of many orders of magnitude less than, say, a neutron star. Remember that the mass of these stars was only just enough to set the nuclear furnaces going, so not enough to create really mind-boggling (not to mention matter-boggling) gravititational effects. If you landed there, it is unlikely that you would be able to take off again, and you would probably lose a lot of height in the mean time, but the gravity is unlikely to be sufficient to spread you out into a monomolecular layer or to create a surface with a billiard-ball smoothness.

I stress that these are merely some of the opinions expressed by members of Cockermouth Astronomical Society and do not constitute an official statement by said society, nor are they backed by academic research into the subject.
User avatar
Dave Moll
Anyone have a spare straightjacket?
 
Posts: 464
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:11 am

Postby Viewmaster » Tue Apr 09, 2013 9:01 pm

Dave Moll wrote:I stress that these are merely some of the opinions expressed by members of Cockermouth Astronomical Society and do not constitute an official statement by said society,


My, that all sounds all very legalistic. Are you a lawyer or QC by any chance?
“One small step for a man,"......because he has Arthritis.
Albert.
User avatar
Viewmaster
Frankenstein was my uncle.
 
Posts: 1306
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 4:50 am
Location: UK Midlands

Postby Dave Moll » Tue Apr 09, 2013 9:23 pm

Not guilty, your honour. :D It's just that I know how easily an opinion turns into a fact - as in, "I read it on the internet, so it must be true."
User avatar
Dave Moll
Anyone have a spare straightjacket?
 
Posts: 464
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:11 am

Postby Panrock » Mon Jul 01, 2013 2:12 am

Dave, just come across your post, months later. Thanks!

Albert has been very quiet lately, and there was no sign of him nor his 'Niptrix' at the convention. Anybody know if he's all right?

Steve O
Panrock
Green padded cells are quite homely.
 
Posts: 870
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 8:25 am
Location: Sedgeberrow, England

Postby Viewmaster » Mon Jul 01, 2013 3:52 am

Panrock wrote:Dave, just come across your post, months later. Thanks!

Albert has been very quiet lately, and there was no sign of him nor his 'Niptrix' at the convention. Anybody know if he's all right?

Steve O


Yes, I am OK but going into other fields.....deep sky astrophotography.
I thought it was time to see where I shall be going soon as a fully fledged
octogenarian. :shock: :lol:

Still soldering though, modifying webcams and construction in the garden, not soldering 1,500 odd LEDs....
...it's much easier, this new malarky. !

I shall still be keeping on eye on all of you on this forum, so be good !
“One small step for a man,"......because he has Arthritis.
Albert.
User avatar
Viewmaster
Frankenstein was my uncle.
 
Posts: 1306
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 4:50 am
Location: UK Midlands

Previous

Return to Off Topic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests

cron