Harry Dalek wrote:Perhaps with smaller holes PMT might have to work at higher voltage but yes i will have to do better next time i make one .I think with the light i have and if i had the right size holes it might be to dim for my eyes as a monitor ...but interesting how far out i am .
Well, that may be so, but that is the problem with physics - it isn't optional, you have to take it as it comes.
You can have lower sensitivity (lower voltage) and more light (greater aperture size), but it will always be at the expense of something else - in this case resolution, that is, the ability to resolve detail.
It boils down to this, if you want a crisp sharp picture you need an aperture size that is proportional to the diameter of the disk, the number of lines, and the aspect ratio of the picture - PI times diameter divided by the number of lines times the aspect ratio.
In the case of your sized disk (120mm) this is a maximum of (PI * 120) / (32 * 1.5) = 0.24 mm.
In truth, because the the picture is curved and not rectangular we calculate from the middle of the picture not the outside edge and that gives .223 mm
That's the dimension across a rectangular (optimum) aperture but because we use circular (sub-optimum) we tend to make them a bit bigger so that there is some overlap.